Wednesday, March 7, 2012

In NJ--and abroad--moves to throttle solar energy


Faced with a crisis in plunging values for credits paid to businesses managers and homeowners who install solar energy systems, New Jersey regulators are recommending an extension of long-term, utility-sponsored programs but at a rate that critics say is inadequate.

A straw proposal being recommended to the Board of Public Utilities by the Office of Clean Energy would providing for an additional 120 megawatts of solar capacity over three years.

That would amount to about 40 megawatts each year, less than half of what was installed last month (84 megawatts) in New Jersey's overheated solar sector, reports NJ Spotlight.

"It's not enough to do anything to prevent a collapse in the solar market," said Lyle Rawlings  of Advanced Solar Products, Inc., a Flemington-based solar developer. "We're extremely concerned."

Rawlings said the 120-megawatt expansion recommended by the straw proposal falls far short of what is necessary to soak up the oversupply of solar credits. "We believe a minimum of 450 megawatts is needed, and even that doesn't close the gap between supply and demand," he said.

The straw proposal is also unclear whether the state will ramp up the requirement that power suppliers provide more of their electricity from solar projects, Rawlings said.

"If they are only proposing to expand utility programs another 120 megawatts, a lot of homeowners, schools, towns and churches will be unable to pay off the bonds for their solar systems," he said.

Division of Rate Counsel Director Stefanie Brand, however, described the straw proposal as reasonable. "It's not too much," said Brand, whose division has been wary about expanding solar programs because the solar credits are ultimately paid off by ratepayers.

"It's a better solution than some of the things that have been proposed," she said, referring to a couple of industry-recommended compromises. "Ratepayer subsidies never have been intended to subsidize this industry for the long term. That wasn't the deal."

[Editor's Note: See yesterday's video interviews with Stefanie Brand and other key players in the debate over the future of offshore wind energy projects in NJ] 


Solar energy also making environmental news in Europe


Political tension over energy policy, particularly government incentives to promote solar, wind, and other alternative energy providers, is growing--not only in the United States but also in Europe.

In Germany, solar-energy advocates and several major trade unions are accusing the center-right government of undermining Germany’s historic Energiewende, or energy transition, according to a report in Renewable Energy World

In the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster, the government shut down half of its nuclear power plants and pledged to accelerate the country’s transition to renewable energies.
 Yet, nearly a year down the road, there is still no overreaching strategy for Germany to meet the ambitious targets it set for itself, including having 36 percent of its electricity generated by green sources in 2020. Moreover, in recent weeks the government announced a draft law that includes hefty reduction in the subsidies that solar power receives from its Feed-in Tariff.
A second element in the draft law shifts responsibility for the amount of renewable electricity eligible for support from parliament to the ministries. This has Energiewende proponents worried that investors will be subject to short-term ministry decisions that will undermine security of planning and financing of projects.

What do you think about government's role in encouraging solar, wind, biomass and other alternative energy developers? Let us know in the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny 'comment' line.'



Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Trying to blow some offshore wind into NJ's energy sails


With a state consultant recommending the rejection of public funding for a demonstration project off Atlantic City, larger offshore projects undergoing a lugubriously slow federal approval process, federal credits drying up, and cheaper natural gas energy flowing into the regional market, New Jersey's hope of becoming the home of the nation's first offshore energy wind farm is losing momentum.  

At an Assembly hearing yesterday in Trenton, offshore wind energy advocates tried to pump some wind into the industry's sagging sails.

Assemblyman Jim Whelan talked about the expected tourism and maritime benefits that Atlantic City expects to reap from the Fishermen's Energy project. Environmentalists stressed that reducing pollution from fossil-fuel energy plants is a worthwhile tradeoff for wind energy's higher, short-term costs, and Telecommunications and Utilities Committee Chairman Upendra Chivukula noted that developing a source of homegrown renewable energy would lessen the nation's dependence on foreign supplies.

We have video interviews with three of the key participants in yesterday's hearing: Stefanie Brand, Director of the NJ Division of Rate Counsel, Fishermen's Energy President Daniel Cohen, and  Committee Chairman Upendra Chivukula.



We recommend that you check out yesterday's post that provided background to the hearing Offshore wind blowing into NJ Legislature-March 5 2012.

NJ Spotlight's Tom Johnson did a nice job summarizing the hearing today in The Tough Task of Making Offshore Wind Pay

Blue Jersey (as they are wont to do) finds a way to blame it all on Governor Chris Christie and the Koch brothers in Is Chris Christie the Third Koch Brother? (video)

What's your take on the status of offshore wind energy?  Use the comment box below. If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny 'comments' line. 




Sunday, March 4, 2012

Offshore wind blowing into NJ Legislature-March 5 2012


The U.S. Department of Energy announced on Thursday that it plans to pump a record $180M into offshore projects over six years, including an initial commitment of $20M in fiscal year 2012. 

That should be great news for the offshore wind industry, for alternative energy, and particularly
for New Jersey. 

Why New Jersey?  

Because:
  1. The U.S. Department of Interior has declared that the greatest offshore wind energy potential--some 1,000 gigawatts of electricity, or one quarter of national demand-- lies off the Atlantic Coast
  2. In 2010, New Jersey adopted a robust package of financial incentives for offshore wind development, setting a target of a minimum of 1,100 MW of wind generation off the state's  with a more ambitious goal of attaining 3000 MW by 2020, and
  3. Those financial incentives encouraged several major developers to propose plans for wind farms off the state's coast.
But ill winds are blowing through New Jersey offshore wind energy's prospects

Despite the encouraging news above, the prospects for construction of wind energy farms off the Jersey coast appear less certain today than they did when the legislation was enacted.

Some primary reasons: 
  1. The cost of the energy that the projects would deliver to the regional grid appear to be much higher than expected.
  2. The booming development of the Marcellus Shale natural gas play in neighboring Pennsylvania (and perhaps some day in New York) promises a competing source of energy at lower prices than what currently planned offshore wind farms can deliver.
  3. The Administration of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who championed offshore wind energy earlier in his tenure, is sounding less enthusiastic about it today. New Jersey businesses pay some of the highest energy rates in the country and public subsidies for offshore wind would drive those prices even higher. Christie's mission is to offer business reasons to stay in New Jersey. Even higher rates for electricity undercuts that mission.
Two recent consulting studies undertaken for the state raise serious questions about the project furthest along in the competition for state financial support-- Fishermen's Atlantic City Windfarm (FACW).

The most damaging of the two, prepared for the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel by Acadian Consulting Group, recommended that the state turn down the project. It includes the chart below addressing Fishermen's projected electric rates and economic effects.
Page  4 of Arcadian Study Group evaluates economic impact of energy rates


















A second study, prepared by
Boston Pacific, a Washington D.C.-based firm and OutSmart,
a Dutch firm specializing in offshore wind farms, did not recommend that the project be rejected, but questioned a number of assumptions made by the developers.

Assembly Committee will meet tomorrow to test the winds

Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities Committee Chairman Upendra J. Chivukula will take testimony from wind energy developers and other interested parties at a hearing scheduled for 10 a.m. Monday, March 5, in Trenton.

Presenters will include: Stephanie A. Brand, Director of N.J. Division of Rate Counsel; Matt Elliott, Global Warming and Clean Energy Associate for Environment New Jersey; Robert Gibbs, Vice President, Garden Shore Offshore Energy and Manager, Development Renewable Energy for PSEG; Daniel Cohen, President of Fisherman's Energy; Stephanie McClellan, Director of Strategic Initiatives Outreach for Atlantic Wind Connection, and David Roncinske of Local 454 Wharf and Dock Builders.


In light of the chilling effect that the two studies likely had in the investment community, the hearing will be an important opportunity for offshore wind advocates to balance the picture. As a prime sponsor of the Offshore Wind and Economic Development Act, Chairman Chivukula is among them. 

In a news release announcing the hearing, he said:

"Wind power needs to be a vital part of our energy portfolio as we explore all possible domestic renewable sources to compete in the growing global marketplace for clean energy. We welcome the Obama Administration's new initiative of substantially increasing investment in this emerging industry by jump starting lower cost high technologies that will generate long-term savings for the industry and benefit ratepayers."

You can listen to the hearing live by clicking here.  After the meeting is over, a recording will be available by going here and then clicking on the Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities link.

Our most recent posts:

RGGI revival legislation clears NJ Senate committee

NJ energy & environment bills up for votes today-2/27/12

Republicans don't want to hear from scientists on climate


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

RGGI revival legislation clears NJ Senate committee

[Updated at 4 p.m. to add related blog posts and video]

The bill we wrote about yesterday to keep New Jersey in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI - pronounced "Reggie") was released yesterday, on a unanimous vote, from the Senate Environment and Energy Committee. 

There were few surprises. Environmentalists and clean energy advocates endorsed the legislation, while business organizations panned it.

Bill Supporters: GreenFaith, Environment New Jersey, American Littoral Society, NJ Conservation Foundation, NJ Audubon, NJ Forestry Association, NJ League of Women Voters, NJ League of Conservation Voters, NJ  Citizens Action, and the NJ Sierra Club.

Bill Opponents: New Jersey Business and Industry Association, Chemistry Council of New Jersey, and NJ State Chamber of Commerce

RGGI REDUX:  Basically, the hearing  testimony was a rerun of what was said last year when similar legislation passed through the Legislature before Gov. Chris Christie stomped it with his veto hammer.

NJ Spotlight's Tom Johnson provides a summary of the meeting today in Lawmakers, Environmentalists Want NJ Back in Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

You also can hear the entire committee meeting online here.

Two interesting pieces of testimony that Tom does not mention:

  1. Bill Wolfe of NJ PEER broke ranks with his environmental compatriots in opposing the bill and the cap-and-trade approach on which it is based (Bill's testimony starts at the 22:00 mark in the recording)

  2. Scott Needham, speaking for Efficiency First, an association of contractors who provide energy efficiency services, testified that, as a businessman who received a grant from the Department of Labor to train workers needed in the growing energy efficiency market, he was confused by the state's withdrawal from the regional program that provided funds to stimulate growth in that sector.
    (Scott's testimony runs from 38:24 to 40:21).         

Is RGGI a failed program that has not reduced greenhouse gases but has jacked up electric costs?  Or is it an evolving model for how other states, too, should be working to cut CO2 while boosting clean energy projects?

Tell s what you think in the comment box below.  If one is not visible, activate it by clicking on the tiny 'comments' link.

Related:
Resurrecting RGGI (BlueJersey opinion and video)

NY awarded for RGGI's economic benefits; NJ lags behind (NRDC staffer blog)

************************************************************************************************************
For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily newsletter 
EnviroPolitics. We track environmental/energy bills--from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

Monday, February 27, 2012

NJ energy & environment bills up for votes today-2/27/12


Nine energy and environment bills are scheduled for consideration today in three New Jersey Senate committees.

The one likely to draw the most attention is Senate President Steve Sweeney's
S-1322 which clarifies that is the intent of the State Legislature for New Jersey to continue its participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).

RGGI (pronounced "Reggie"")  is a multi-state pact that
maintains an emissions auction and trading mechanism to reduce the level of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 

The program requires plants in the region that burn fossil fuels to buy pollution allowances for the carbon they emit, which they can trade among themselves. The proceeds are used to fund clean-energy programs in participating states. It took effect in 2008, making it the first cap on greenhouse gas emissions implemented in the United States.


Governor Chris Christie announced last year that he was withdrawing New Jersey from RGGI on grounds that the program had not been successful in reducing greenhouse gases.


In addition to New Jersey, states in the RGGI are Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont.


Here is today's legislative lineup:

S-429
  Van Drew, J. (D-1); Stack, B.P. (D-33)
Requires municipalities to submit economic growth plans to DCA for approval of continued participation in the urban enterprise zone program.
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Community and Urban Affairs


S-495  Bucco, A.M. (R-25); Oroho, S.V. (R-24)
Establishes Lake Hopatcong Fund, dedicates $700,000 annually from pleasure boat registration fees to that fund, and appropriates $700,000 for FY2009.
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Environment and Energy


S-872  Cunningham, S.B. (D-31)
Authorizes incinerator authorities to perform sanitation, public works, and environmental services.
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Community and Urban Affairs


S-1322  Sweeney, S.M. (D-3); Smith, B. (D-17)
Clarifies intent of P.L.2007, c.340 regarding NJ's required participation in Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
Related Bill: A-1998
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Environment and Energy


S-1355  Bateman, C. (R-16); Gordon, R.M. (D-38)
Requires plans, specifications, and bid proposal documents for certain local public contracts to address soil contamination.
Related Bill: A-1289
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Environment and Energy


S-1460  Sweeney, S.M. (D-3)
Requires deposit of property tax refunds for certain industrial sites under federal or State orders for remediation with commissioner of environmental protection to help ensure compliance.
Related Bill: A-2294
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Budget and Appropriations


S-1555  Smith, B. (D-17)
Concerns combined sewer overflows; exempts improvements thereto from 2% property tax cap; requires certain permit holders address such overflows in capital improvement plans; and appropriates $5 million.
Related Bill: A-2640
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Environment and Energy


S-1556  Smith, B. (D-17)
Clarifies definition of "on-site generation facility" in "Electric Discount Energy Competition Act" with regard to geographic contiguity with end use customer.
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Environment and Energy


S-1557  Smith, B. (D-17)
Authorizes creation of stormwater utilities for certain local government entities.
Related Bill: A-2641
     Feb 27, 2012  – Posted: Senate Environment and Energy

Related:

************************************************************************************************************
For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily newsletter 
EnviroPolitics. We track environmental/energy bills--from introduction to enactment.
***********************************************************************************************************

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Republicans don't want to hear from scientists on climate

Rick Santorum speaking at GOP Leadership Conference
Photo credit: Gage Skidmore, Flickr
InsideClimate News reports today that a number of prominent U.S. climate scientists who identify themselves as Republican say their attempts in recent years to educate the GOP leadership on the scientific evidence of man-made climate change have been futile. Now, many have given up trying and the few who continue notice very little change after speaking with politicians and their aides.

"No GOP candidates or policymakers want to touch the issue, and those of us trying to educate them are left frustrated," Kerry Emanuel, an atmospheric scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a registered Republican, told InsideClimate News. "Climate change has become a third rail in politics."

Heading into the 2008 presidential election, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the Republican nominee, warned about the dangers of global warming. He was one of a group of moderate Republicans who used to be leading climate action advocates, acknowledging the scientific consensus on climate change and the need for federal policies to address it.

But with the rise of the Tea Party movement in 2009, skepticism or even flat-out denial of global warming has become part of the party's core message. And no candidate now vying for the GOP nomination can admit to the scientific consensus, much less advocate for measures to curb climate-altering emissions, no matter what positions they might have taken in the past.

In fact, past support of policies to regulate carbon dioxide, a global warming gas, is being used to question the fitness of candidates to become the party's nominee. During a speech this month at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Rick Santorum tore into his GOP presidential rival, former Gov. of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, for buying into man-made warming and supporting the nation's first cap-and-trade program known as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Romney later opposed the scheme but Massachusetts did participate, and it has benefited from the nearly $500 million in economic activity the program has brought to the state.

A Tea Party favorite, Santorum has called global warming "a facade," "a hoax" and an example of the "politicization of science." Both Romney and Newt Gingrich, another candidate for the party's nomination, have stepped away from their previous stances that humans are contributing to global warming in order to convince restive voters and donors that they are conservative enough to be the party's luminary.

The GOP's hardening stance in favor of climate skepticism, however, is not reflected among the country's leading scientists, no matter the party. Roughly 98 percent of U.S. climate researchers are convinced that rising emissions from human activities is hastening climate change, according to a 2010 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

While it's rare for scientists to disclose their political affiliations, InsideClimate News tracked down a handful of leading climate and environmental scientists who have done so and are registered Republican or have a majority of their values in line with the party. All accept the consensus that Earth is warming mainly from the buildup of greenhouse gases produced from the burning of fossil fuels. And all say their attempts to talk with GOP politicians and their aides about climate dangers have largely fallen on deaf ears. Calls and emails to the campaigns of Santorum, Romney and Gingrich for comment were not returned.

Scientists tell their stories: GOP Not Listening to Its Own Scientists on Climate Change

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like this post? You'll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics
Try it free for 30 days!
  No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click



Tuesday, February 21, 2012

MIT's liquid battery--the answer for renewable energy?

As several panelists noted at last week's Solar Energy Symposium in New Jersey, solar and wind energy will become a true alternative (or, at least, a greater complement) to fossil-fuel generation only when their intermittent supply limitations can be offset by large-scale and affordable storage capacity.

MIT Professor Donald Sadoway and
Research Affiliate David Bradwell

A new generation of batteries to capture wind power at night (when a utility's demand is low) or to utilize solar energy to power air conditioning units during heat waves (even on cloudy days when soar panels are producing fewer watts) is the holy grail of alternative energy research.

Today, there is promising environmental news from scientists at MIT who are working on a new type of 'liquid battery' that they believe could provide that storage at far lower cost and with greater longevity than other methods

The high-temperature battery's liquid components, like some novelty cocktails, naturally settle into distinct layers because of their different densities.

The three molten materials form the positive and negative poles of the battery, as well as a layer of electrolyte — a material that charged particles cross through as the battery is being charged or discharged — in between. 

The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.
The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.
The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.
The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.
The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.
The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
The negative electrode (anode) is in the top layer and is made of magnesium; the middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride; and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.
The negative electrode (anode) in the top layer is made of magnesium. The middle layer, the electrolyte, consists of a salt mixture containing magnesium chloride, and the bottom layer, which is the positive electrode (cathode), is made of antimony.

The system would operate at a temperature of 700 degrees Celsius, or 1,292 degrees Fahrenheit.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.
This battery operates at a temperature of 700 °C, which is 1,292 °F.

All three layers are composed of materials that are abundant and inexpensive, according to Donald Sadoway, the John F. Elliott Professor of Materials Chemistry at MIT and the senior author of the new paper reported in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like this post? You'll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics 
Try it free for 30 days!
No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The inspiration for the concept came from Sadoway’s earlier work on the electrochemistry of aluminum smelting, which is conducted in electrochemical cells that operate at similarly high temperatures. Many decades of operation have proved that such systems can operate reliably over long periods of time at an industrial scale, producing metal at very low cost. In effect, he says, what he figured out was “a way to run the smelter in reverse.”

Over the last three years, Sadoway and his team — including MIT Materials Processing Center Research Affiliate David Bradwell MEng ’06, PhD ’11, the lead author of the new paper — have gradually scaled up their experiments.

Their initial tests used batteries the size of a shot glass; they then progressed to cells the size of a hockey puck, three inches in diameter and an inch thick. Now, they have started tests on a six-inch-wide version, with 200 times the power-storage capacity of the initial version.

Read more about the MIT liquid battery research
Liquid batteries could level the load
MIT: Liquid Batteries Have Huge Potential

 

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

What's in store for New Jersey's solar-energy industry?


Panel discussion at NJBIZ Solar Energy Symposium 2012


[Updated on 2/19/12 to add two new related stories]


[Be sure to see our video interview below with Al Matos
of PSE&G and Assemblyman
Upendra Chivukula]







Generous federal credits and supportive state policies have helped to create a thriving solar-energy industry in New Jersey--evident today at a Solar Energy Symposium sponsored by NJBIZ that attracted a crowd of more than 500 in Somerset County.

Looking out at the SRO crowd at one of the morning forums on which he was a panelist, Sun Farm Network's Mark Warner joked that, just a few years ago, he could get together with all of the state's solar energy business leaders, share a single pizza, and still have a few slices left over.

Today, New Jersey has even surpassed sunny California in the number of some installed solar systems and many companies here are aggressively pursuing commercial and residential clients. Several dozen of them--and related services like law firms, accountants and construction companies--were behind the booth at exhibits today promoting their businesses.

But troubling clouds are gathering and many of the public questions and private conversations today reflected a sense of industry insecurity and anxiety.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like this post? You'll love our daily newsletter, 
EnviroPolitics 
Try it free for 30 days! No obligation. Cancel anytime with one click
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What's troubling New Jersey's booming solar energy industry?


Among the factors that keep industry members awake at night are these:

  • Federal subsidies are about to end and the value of credits paid for solar energy is plunging.
  • The state has a new Energy Management Plan and an unfamiliar new man, Bob Hanna, at the helm at the Board of Public Utilities (BPU), the agency that sets policy for energy and regulates all energy providers.
  • The state legislature, the BPU, and the administration of Governor Chris Christie are not yet on the same page when it comes to the degree of support the state should provide to alternative energy providers like solar and offshore wind.
  • Businesses with large energy demands are rebelling against government mandates that encourage solar but, in so doing, increase their cost of  electricity. 

While the forums at today's event may not have supplied many definitive answers about the industry's future, they did help to define the challenges that lie ahead.  Bottom line: It's a complex business. Positions are evolving. Stay tuned.

EnviroPolitics had a few questions for two NJBIZ event panelists, PSE&G's Al Matos and Assemblyman Upendra Chivukula. Their answers contained some interesting details. Click on the arrow in the center of the photo below to view the video interview.

 

Related:
Solar Growth Spurt: Good News -- At Least for Now

BPU chief says he's trying to stabilize ‘overheated' solar sector
SREC Market Trades Below $200 for the first time since September 15, 2011


Our most recent posts:
Environmental bills in New Jersey Legislature - Feb 16

Tougher standards lie ahead for dry cleaning fluid PERC

NJ Senator challenges critics to fix his state forest bill 

********************************************************************************************************
For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily newsletter
EnviroPolitics. It tracks all energy and environmental legislation--from introduction to enactment. 

********************************************************************************************************

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Environmental bills in New Jersey Legislature - Feb 16


The Senate Economic Growth Committee will take up S-1351 (Lesniak) which requires state licensing--including personal disclosures and background checks--for all businesses owners, sales people and key employees offering recycling services in New Jersey.

Also to be considered is S-1566  (Lesniak) which establishes the New Jersey Residential Foreclosure Transformation Act, providing a expedited process for foreclosing abandoned  residential proprieties..

The committee will meet at 10:30  a.m. in Room 1 on the first floor of the State House Annex in Trenton.
 
The Assembly will meet at 1 p. m. for a voting session. 


Among the bills to be considered are:


A-733  Eustace, T.J. (D-38); Schepisi, H. (R-39)
Prohibits health care institutions from discharging prescription medications into sewer or septic systems.

A-1998  McKeon, J.F. (D-27); Chivukula, U.J. (D-17)
Clarifies intent of P.L.2007, c.340 regarding NJ's required participation in Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The bill was released from the Assembly Environment and Solid Waste Committee on February 2 following lengthy and interesting testimony from business and environmental representatives.
You can hear the entire session here


********************************************************************************************************
For thorough coverage of environmental news, issues, legislation and regulation in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, try a free, 30-day subscription to our daily newsletter
EnviroPoliticsWe track environmental/energy bills--from introduction to enactment.
********************************************************************************************************