Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Analyzing the cap-and-trade vote in Pennsylvania


On Saturday, we focused on the key role played by three New Jersey Republicans in the narrow passage of the Waxman-Markey climate-change bill in the House. (Jersey Republicans key to climate bill passage)

Matt Friedman reports in PolitickerNJ that the three are facing heat from conservatives over their votes and they may face primary challenges because of it. The New York Times's Green Inc. blog quotes Rush Limbaugh linking the "northeastern Republicans" to Wall Street and urging that they be "sent packing" at re-election time.

Today, we recommend an analysis of the vote from a Pennsylvania perspective. It's written for PoliticsPA by Louis Jacobson, a contributing editor with National Journal magazine. He says that, for most members of Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation, Friday’s vote was not about ideology but about quietly doing the safest thing for their district – and for their own reelection prospects.

Your views? Use the comment box below. If you don't see it, click on the tiny 'comments' line.

Related:
Gerlach opposes cap-and-trade bill
Conservative Ire Rains on 8 Republicans Who Voted for House Climate Bill

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get EnviroPolitics for the top environmental and political news
in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York every business day.
PLUS: Proposed environmental regulation alerts
PLUS: Full tracking of environmental legislation
Get EnviroPolitics free, without obligation, for 30 days!

Subscribe here to view all our YouTube videos

Repost this article