Colorado Independent
For years, the secret ingredients in fracking fluid have been better protected than the location of Dick Cheney’s bunker.
It seems that Mr. Cheney’s former company, Halliburton, which makes fracking fluid, knows a thing or two about keeping the lid on secrets that might not play well in public.
Especially when the secret sauce in Halliburton fracking fluid is suspected to contain ingredients that could pose a serious threat to underground aquifers that supply drinking water for millions of residents in Pennsylvania and New York.
But that may be changing due to the action of regulators in the state of Wyoming.
The Casper Star-Tribune reports that, on June 8, member’s of Wyoming’s Oil and Gas Commission voted unanimously to adopt new rules requiring oil and gas companies to disclose chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," the process involving the high-pressure injection of water and chemicals into shale rock to release natural gas.
“Industry organizations and individual companies argued against the new rules, claiming the industry has a proven track record. That point is often countered by others who say lax reporting requirements prevent the public from knowing whether fracking has ever contaminated drinking water sources.”
In the May-June issue of Audubon Magazine, Ted Williams investigates the potential environmental costs of fracking in the Marcellus shale which cuts a wide swath through portions of New York and Pennsylvania. In his article, Gas Pains, Williams writes:
“A single frack job can require five million gallons of water. Aquatic life is at risk when gas companies dewater streams for fracking and when they store or dispose of used frack water. Not only is the industry allowed to protect the chemical composition of frack water as a trade secret, but under what’s called the “Halliburton Loophole,” fracking is exempt from Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. This was a 2005 gift from then vice president Dick Cheney to the company he used to run.
“Something like three-quarters of the frack water stays in the earth, but that which flows back has acquired additional toxins such as salts, xylene, benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, heavy metals, and naturally occurring radioactive material usually consisting of radium isotopes—bone-seeking carcinogens.
“Because fracking takes place far below aquifers, groundwater contamination can be prevented by sealing drilling shafts, but the shafts aren’t always properly sealed. For example, in Dimock Township, Pennsylvania, 63 wells drilled by Texas-based Cabot Oil & Gas in nine square miles have polluted groundwater and caused private wells to explode, 15 families allege in a lawsuit. Last November the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) fined Cabot $120,000 and ordered it to provide permanent water supplies to affected families.”
It’s notable that Wyoming, a state that has had a long and friendly relationship with the drilling industry, is the first to require that the contents of fracking fluid be disclosed.
It could be a harbinger of things to come.
New York State is working on new regulations to govern natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale. Pennsylvania’s government has lagged but is now showing signs of stirring from its regulatory slumber. Meanwhile, the federal Environmental Protection Agency has launched a full-scale study of fracking and its environmental consequences.
Time will tell how far any of these new initiatives will go, but as long as the BP debacle in the Gulf drags on and fracking wells keep leaking and exploding in the Marcellus Shale, the change could be significant.
Related:
‘Gasland’ - Do the pictures tell the fracking story?
Lawmakers in NY and PA weigh a gas-drilling moratorium Fracking the Marcellus Shale: Disaster ahead?
Out-of-control well spews--in Pennsylvania
Don't worry, shale gas will rock your world
------------------------------------------------------------------
I sent the following email to my congress people and the president via the congress.org website... and I encourage others to do the same.
ReplyDeleteDear Honorable Congresspeople and Mr. President,
I am writing to request that you give your total support to S. 1215, The FRAC Act of 2009, a bill to remove the environmental exemptions that are given for natural gas drilling. These exemptions were given in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The clean air, clean water, and superfund act regulations are vital to the protection of our most valued natural resources; those that sustain life on a daily basis. We could live without energy, but not without air and water.
We all know that natural gas is an important source of clean energy and jobs for our country. However, the process of mining it should also be clean and covered by the same standards as other mining and commercial activities. There have been reports of ground water contamination coupled with denials of responsibility by the companies that are drilling. Just as we are facing a disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, we are likewise at risk here on land and especially in the great state of Texas. Here there are thousands of gas wells in the greater Ft. Worth and other Barnet shale areas. It would only take a few well accidents to contaminate water which may end up on our lakes, rivers, and aquifers.
I urgently request you to take notice of this drilling activity and the associated environmental risk and I implore you to restore the regulations that protect us all. Our safe and clean future depends on it. I ask you to please use your influence with the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works where the bill is currently referred.
I have many friends and business people in my district and throughout Texas. I will be sending copies of this correspondence to them all and request that they write to you as well. My vote in the next congressional election will depend in large part on the actions you take relative to this topic. If you would like to meet with me in person or by teleconference, I would welcome an opportunity to provide more information and viewpoints.
I thank you greatly for your time and consideration.
Tom