Mike Soraghan of Greenwire broke the story yesterday in the New York Times' Green blog.
Gen. Peter "Duke" DeLuca of the Army Corps of Engineers outlined the position in a letter (pdf) written to Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.) and released today.What do you think about the Obama administration's approach? Let us know in the comment box below. If one isn't visible, click on the tiny 'comments' link to activate it.
The letter offers the first indication of the administration's position on gas drilling in the Northeast since the day after the Nov. 2 midterm election when President Obama highlighted gas drilling as a potential area of common ground with Republicans (Greenwire, Nov. 4).
DeLuca, the Army Corps' North Atlantic division engineer, is the federal representative on the Delaware River Basin Commission, which is developing regulations for gas drilling in eastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York.
Hinchey and local environmentalists want the commission to keep its drilling moratorium until its staff does a "cumulative impacts" study, a process that could take years. Drilling supporters want the commission to move ahead as quickly as possible and dislike that the commission has blocked drilling in Pennsylvania while drilling continues rapidly in the rest of the state.
DeLuca's letter, dated Nov. 24, received by Hinchey yesterday and released today, says that he has consulted extensively with other agencies and developed an administration position on drilling in the 13,539-square-mile watershed.
"The administration's position is to continue fully supporting the need for a cumulative impact study," DeLuca wrote. "Simultaneously, all these agencies support the DRBC's decision to develop and release draft natural gas regulations."
Our most recent posts:
Susan Boyle recognized by Philadelphia SWEP group
Enviro-Events Calendar for NJ, PA, NY & DE
Susan Boyle recognized by Philadelphia SWEP group
Enviro-Events Calendar for NJ, PA, NY & DE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like this post? You'll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics
Try it free for 30 days!
No obligation. Cancel anytime with a single click
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try it free for 30 days!
No obligation. Cancel anytime with a single click
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
there is a chemical free method of fracking presented by ecosphere technologies why don't our hardworking politicians consider requiring it to protect our water supplies from carcinogenic chemicals.the frack fluid is a waste that will pose contamination risks whereever it goes and there is no effective method of disposal. billions of gallons of our clean precious water reduced to carcinogenic sludge. you'd think that alone would have everyone near to it fuming. frack attack america. fight back. we have better ways. do we want all the farming tourism wineries and ecology destroyed? or do we want clean renewable sustainable energy and politicians who fight for our livelihood and our childrens livelihood, and water that will be preserved for more then 100 years...shaleshock.org fight this with everything you've got. or one letter. one. lets save our water, air, and perhaps the life of our children, our neighbors, ourselves. fight back
ReplyDelete