Writing in the latest issue of Yale Environment 360, Daniel B. Botkin, professor emeritus of the University of California, Santa Barbara, says the fact that shale gas exists in abundance is beyond question. But what is the reality behind the optimistic claims for shale gas?
The U.S. Geological Survey, Botkin writes, lists natural gas “reserves” — the amount believed to be in the ground — in four categories: readily available with current technologies, which accounts for only 1 percent of the known natural gas in U.S. territorial limits; technically recoverable (5 percent); marginal targets for accelerated technology (6 percent); and unknown but probable (84 percent). Shale gas shares the fourth category with coal gas and methyl hydrates. The latter are a kind of water ice with methane embedded in it and occur only where it is very cold, in Arctic permafrost and below 3,000 feet in the oceans.
In researching how best to make the transition to the green energy future, one of the first calculations Botkin made was to find out how long the natural gas in each of the four categories would last if we obtained it independently — that is, only from U.S. territory.
He says he was shocked by the result:
“Just using our 2006 rates of use of natural gas consumption — not including any major transition to fueling our cars and trucks — the “readily available” gas within the United States would be exhausted in just one year. That, plus what is called “technically recoverable” gas, would be gone in less than a decade. What is termed ‘unknown but probable’ would last about a century.”
“This means that any significant increase in our consumption of natural gas will have to come from the ‘unknown but probable’ reserves, much of which will be from formations of shale, a sedimentary rock formed from muds in which bacteria released methane. Most of this gas is so deep underground or otherwise not very accessible that nobody is really sure that we can get at a lot of it, or of how high an environmental price we must pay to retrieve it.”
Click here to read the entire article
Is it just me or are you also hearing the echoes of issues associated with deep-sea oil drilling?
To share your thoughts or pose your questions, use the comment box below.
Our most recent posts:
Appalachian power line PATH misses another deadline
Environmental bills up for votes Monday in NJ
Shale gas drilling controversy no longer local
NJ Chamber of Commerce elects new directors
What’s in fracking fluid? Wyoming wants to know
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like this post? You’ll love our daily newsletter
EnviroPolitics - Try it free for 30 days!
No obligation. Cancel anytime with a single click
