Tuesday, June 20, 2017

A new defense for potential CERCLA “arrangers”?


This post from Gibbons attorneys  and  is not for the average reader, but attorneys and LSRPs involved in site cleanups are likely to find it quite interesting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In Town of Islip v. Datre, a recent decision out of the Eastern District of New York, the court adopted an approach to “arranger liability” under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) that holds parties cannot be liable unless they knew that the substances they arranged for disposal were, in fact, hazardous. 

The Islip court’s approach represents a departure from traditional considerations of arranger liability and, if followed by future courts, may present a defense for potentially responsible parties who, though intentionally arranging for disposal of materials which ultimately lead to contamination, lacked specific knowledge that such materials contained hazardous substances.

The Islip case arises out of illegal dumping of hazardous construction and demolition debris that occurred at a public park (“the park”) in Islip, New York between 2013 and 2014. Though the case involves an elaborate and bizarre dumping scheme involving, among many others, a local church, ...

Click Here to View Full Blog Post  

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column --- >>


Subscribe here to view all our YouTube videos

Repost this article